The
evolution of technology has caught the world asleep at the wheel; on a daily
basis, newscasters, politicians, and analysts criticize the advance of
artificial intelligence and its deep implantment in the fabric of human life.
It seems as if innovators have been distracted by their efforts dedicated to
solving problems and have neglected to foresee the negative consequences that
can erupt from a computer with too much power. However, could our aptitude for
constructing entire virtual universes have been expected years ago? In 1999,
David Gelernter, a computer science professor at Yale University, authored an essay titled "The Second Coming — A Manifesto" in which he gazes into
the cyberspace of technology's future through a lens that has never been used before
(Gelertner, 1999).
Gelernter's
manifesto is comprised of 58 points of commentary that criticize humanity's
limitations in creation, characterize the limitless power of computers, and
dictate the inevitable abilities of future systems and their elements. At the
time of the essay's publishing, humanity stood at the edge of substantial
alterations in the way technology is managed. Computers had already evolved
significantly from their conception to the late 1990s, and Gelernter's
manifesto acts as a direction for further gradation in a more effective manner
than ever before. His tone throughout the manifesto is that of cultivating
irritation with the stagnation of computers; he seems to understand the possibility that exists for the betterment of the current systems and is
frustrated that not enough is being done to move forward.
References
Gelernter, D. (1999). The Second
Coming – A Manifesto. Edge. Retrieved
from https://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge70.html
Very well written article, and it shows clearly that you have read and understood the material and the author's intent. I think it would serve you well to tie this information with some sort of modern day example to better illustrate these conventions in computers that you bring up. Also, an image or two, and bolding of key phrases would help with reader engagement!
ReplyDeleteHello anmorsi, your blog post was well written. Based on your summary of Galernter’s article, it is clear you understand the text. However, you did not expand upon the relationship between Galernter’s text and the current state of artificial intelligence and intelligent machines outside of your introduction. You could improve your post by creating a clear topic related to the text.
ReplyDelete