Friday, February 7, 2020

The Degree of Anonymity

We are often faced with the challenge of transparency. How transparent should we be on the internet to ensure we don’t give away too much information and still, get that free account on Spotify or a date on Tinder?

In the article Social Networking Virtues, Vallor points out that anonymity has low entry and exit barriers as compared to social environments (online and offline) but is heavily correlated with less result. So, we can see a linear relationship between transparency and data concern combined with what you’re trying to achieve from the internet be it ordering a perfume for your friend or surfing through HBO. But what is the optimal point? Maybe it varies from site to site or maybe on every individual person based on how worried they are about their data privacy.

Transparency vs Data Concern and Result

Netflix unintentionally stumbled upon this topic back in 2006 when it rolled out a $1M prize for a contest that challenged entrants to improve its recommendation algorithm by 10%. The Netflix Prize was an open competition for the best collaborative filtering algorithm to predict user ratings for films, based on the data Netflix collected from its users. Netflix provided a data set of over 17,000 movies generated by 480,0189 anonymous users without any other information about the users or films. It was a win-win situation: Netflix received relatively cheap R&D, while statistics enthusiasts had a shot at winning a big payday.

Winners of Netflix Prize
Although the data sets were constructed to preserve customer privacy, the Prize has been criticized by privacy claiming that Netflix gave away private information. In 2007, two researchers from The University of Texas at Austin were able de-anonymize user’s identity if that user had also left movie ratings at another site, such as IMDB. Companies like Netflix, Facebook, Google, and Apple are always releasing anonymous data to the public to allow them to build upon the data and in return improve their software and service. I’m sure they want to keep this data as anonymous as they can to avoid the economic ramifications and still get the desired result. But they have no idea of the optimal point is between transparency and result. Does anyone know how anonymous we should be on the internet? The irony is that it wouldn’t be long till a startup becomes a tech giant by guiding people on how transparent they should be and unintentionally ends up using that data set.

 

3 comments:

  1. Hi Keshav,

    This post brings up a good point about how there are certain degrees of anonymity. Most services require quite a bit of information to set up an account, but this does not stop people from just creating 'dummy' emails to sign up for these services. I like how in your example of the Netflix Prize, you explain that the data set was constructed to anonymize users, but people were still able to find out that private information. I enjoyed reading your post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your post. This is really a new but serious topic that we should consider. Different people have different attitudes and levels of tolerance. While there are opinions that some privacy can be abandoned in exchange of better service, others would like to have full privacy. It really depends on those company to decide a way that most customers feel comfortable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This post was very intriguing to read, as I've recently has issues with seeing Ads on various popular websites for things that related to google searches I conducted or even scarier, things that my friends and I would be talking about. I loved how you tied in the Netflix story, and alluded to the "balance' of information that we need to maintain when we sign up for free accounts or paid subscriptions. Davids, point in the comment earlier about dummy accounts brings up a good point. Why doesn't everyone just use a Dummy account. I wonder if the agreement everyone skips over when creating their account has any clause about data sharing. Overall, great blog post, it really made me think about the information I should be sharing.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.