Friday, February 21, 2020

The Forgotten Man in “Don’t F**k With Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer”



Cut from the documentary: the first trigger
The documentary “Don’t F**k With Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer” is about a group of tech-savvy animal lovers who started a Facebook group to hunt down Luka Magnotta. He is a notorious animal abuser who gained fame through uploading a video of him suffocating kittens with a vacuum bag. Nevertheless, I would like to shift the lens a little bit and talk about someone who was barely mentioned in the documentary.

Cut from the documentary: the threats
While the online activists were tracking down Magnotta by analyzing the clues in his video, a guy named Jamsey was also posting similar content and even falsely admitted that he was the Kitten Killer. That’s when people started leaving threatening comments on his Facebook page. 

Violent comments left on Jamsey's FB
It didn't take long for people to discover Jamsey's true identity. He was in Internet troll who needed attention to distract himself from his mental problems. His real name was Edward Jordan, and people later learned that Jordan had taken his own life. Did he deserve this?

What happened between the online activists and Jamsey demonstrates the idea that virtual communities can promote radical self-interest instead of promoting genuine equality (Adam, 2010). While the group members were advocating for people to be more humane, they were also torturing someone they knew little about with threatening comments. The arrival of the Internet has allowed stalking practices to occur in cyberspace, and the ease of electronic stalking has aggravated moral issues regarding privacy (Tavani, 2002).
Tracking? Stalking?

We live in an age where we are only a few clicks away from other people's private details. Releasing personal information can result in ‘antisocial networking’ (Griffiths and Light, 2008) which involves scamming, stealing and bullying that often happens on social media platforms. This online environment enabled both Jordan and the group members to act online in ways that they wouldn't in reality. 

The human power of these activists had a very deadly impact. However, the process of seeking justice comes with consequences. Apart from personal information leakages, these hunters can find false information and end up accusing the wrong people.
Reflections from an activist 
I often think to myself whether the activists should be considered entirely innocent for Jordan’s death just because they had good intentions. There is a thin line between hunting and stalking online. The same tool that helps police identify and track down criminals also allows individuals to harass each other to the point where they are destroying people’s lives. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam, Alison. “Personal Values and Computer Ethics.” The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, edited by Luciano Floridi, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010, pp. 149–162. 

Don't F**k With Cats: Hunting An Internet Killer. Directed by Mark Lewis. United States: Raw TV, 2019.

Griffiths, Marie., Light, Ben. Social networking and digital gaming media convergence: Classification and its consequences for appropriation. Inf Syst Front 10, 447–459 (2008). 

Tavani, Herman T., 2002. “The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly Is at Issue, and Why Does It Matter?” Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1): 37-54. [18 pages]

3 comments:

  1. This was a really cool post. I also watched this documentary, and I was shocked by how much power these online activists had. For example, the fact that they could track him down using Google maps to find familiar traffic lights is insane. I think you did a great job of discussing the ethical issues involved with the documentary, especially compared to your first post. I can tell that you spent a lot of time elaborating on your analysis. However, what do you think we should do about this ethical dilemma? Should the activists be punished for harassing people online? If so, how? Additionally, I thought the gifs were a bit distracting when I was trying to focus on reading your writing, but that may just be me. Overall, great job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoyed reading your post! I can see that you made an effort to involve the class readings into this revision more and make them more of the main idea. I also really appreciated the brief explanation that you gave at the beginning since I haven't seen the documentary and don't know much about this situation. My suggestion would be to remove at least one if not both of the gifs at the beginning and replace them with photos because I found them to be distracting while trying to read the post. Additionally, it would be great if the class content could come into play a bit earlier on so that it can really be the main theme of the post. However, I thought what you wrote was super engaging and easy to read. Really nice work overall!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how your post gives a simple but clear example of how emerging tech can create morally ambiguous scenarios. In one hand, Jordan had obviously done some horrible things, but him taking his own life makes you wonder who really is at fault here. Perhaps everyone involved? Also perhaps consider reformatting the first couple images because it kind of makes it hard to read when the text gets cut off at weird points.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.