They just won't listen until something bad happens. At which point it'll be too late.
The issue of whether the government should get involved in regulating AI is a whole other discussion in itself. What's truly remarkable is the fact that there is a concern that a machine we built to think by itself may turn their back on us and that seems like something straight out of a science fiction novel. But who is truly responsible for the harm that the machine causes? Is it the creator of the moral agent or is AI a moral agent that can make moral decisions? Floridi and Sanders in their paper "On the Morality of Artificial Agents" discuss that an agent should be held accountable for their actions depending on their interactivity with his surroundings, autonomy, and adaptability to change their perception depending on the situation.
The ramifications of giving moral agency to AI are groundbreaking, to say the least. If an AI is responsible for their actions then they can be punished for crimes they commit, we are essentially admitting that they are our equals and that they have free will to act as they choose. We are attributing that they have a conscience and that they have rights that should be protected. They will develop what is known as feelings and opinions. They are essentially a whole new species of people that we created. That's why this question is so important for the future of mankind. We are able to see a glimpse of it with creations such as these chatbots in the video were they have quite an interesting conversation. https://youtu.be/WnzlbyTZsQY
I was not aware that this conversation was taking place, it's really interesting to see the interaction between government authorities and the tech giants. In a way, I feel like the government will soon be unable to keep up with the changes in tech because its officials simply won't have the background. Your piece is informative and draws a nice parallel between the content we're looking at in class and the current state of affairs. I think, however, that it would benefit from some personal input and opinion. Writing is always more compelling when it draws evidence from the author's personal experience. How do you feel about regulation in this industry? Have you had any adverse experiences as a result of AI that could be solved through regulation?
ReplyDelete