Last year, I came across a documentary called “Don’t F**k With Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer”. The documentary is about how a group of tech-savvy was able to hunt down Luka Magnotta, a notorious animal abuser who was also charged for the First-degree murder of a Chinese student. Nevertheless, this blog post is not about the power of digital footprints in tracking. Instead, I would like to focus on a man that the documentary barely mentioned, and you will soon find out why.
In 2010, Magnotta uploaded a video of him suffocating two kittens with a vacuum bag. This enraged numerous animal lovers, and a Facebook group was later formed to find the perpetrator. They tried to analyze everything that was featured in the video in order to identify and locate Magnotta.
Meanwhile, a guy named Jamsey posted a video of a cat being burned alive caught their attention, and his Facebook profile photo resembled Magnotta. Most importantly, he later admitted that he was the Kitten Killer. People were FURIOUS, and plenty of threatening comments were left on Jamsey’s Facebook page.
Soon after, Jamsey’s true identity was discovered by one of the group members. He turned out not to be who they were looking for, and his real name was Edward Jordan. Unfortunately, people later learned that Jordan had taken his own life, and that he was just trolling online to avoid the severe depression that he was going through.
This also reminded me of the Human Flesh Search Engines (HFSE) in China. It is a means of search powered by the cooperation between netizens to “learn the truth and exercise their rights of supervision and criticism” (Yang and Zheng 2010). As traditional search engines are based on keyword matching, superfluous information are hard to avoid. And therefore human power is a more sophisticated tool for sifting through information. However, the process of seeking justice often involves personal information leakages, and just like the manhunt of Magnotta, these “hunters” are only human after all. No matter how meticulous they are, they can still make mistakes and people can get wrongly accused.
Fast-forward to today, I still often think to myself whether the activists should be considered entirely innocent for Jordan’s death just because they had good intentions. “The animal activists, in my opinion, they are a disgrace. You are not the police, and you are also acting like stalkers”. Regardless of this being a quote by Magnotta’s mother, I think it still does point to the fact that there is a thin line between hunting and stalking.
It would be interesting if you elaborated more on the difference between being an Internet hunter or stalker. Are they not both the same thing? What distinguishes the two? And is one more morally justified than the other? What makes online hunting okay but not stalking, or vice versa?
ReplyDeleteI remember watching this documentary this past winter break,so when I saw your post it definitely piqued my interest. I also had similar questions as you did in regards to the fate of Edward Jordan and how the line between stalker and internet justice seeker often gets blurred. I would love to see if you could elaborate on that more. Questions like defining "what is the difference between the stalker and the hunter?" or examing how out initial intentions can bring about unforseen consequences are avenues worth exploring.
ReplyDeleteThis documentary was nuts, I was blown away by this and how they could find him. It just simply amazes me that my footprint could do something similar. It makes me think just how far away could you go to escape this, and if you could at all.
ReplyDeleteHi! Very interesting topic. You chose something that your audience would be interested in to reel in the reader, as this documentary is currently trending on Netflix. You did a wonderful job making this blog emphasize a question, however still adding a personal touch to create your voice and style. Additionally, as you are trying to draw the line between hunting and stalking, this very effectively ties back to ethics, an important topic in our course. This post could even better if you immediately point out the reason your reader should want to continue to read your post in the first paragraph instead of mentioning "you will soon find out why". Secondly, I think there is room to curtail the summary of the documentary, and really make your opinions and thoughts the star of the show. Well done, and I'm looking forward to seeing your edits
ReplyDelete